Comments on: 2012

By: Ken N

Ken N — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:04:55 +0000

Dumb. . Dumb. . Dumb. . . . Its gets a star for the eruption of Yellowstone cool. . Last 30-45 minutes of the film was one of the most ridiculous I’ve ever seen. You have been warned. . . Rating: 1 / 5

By: Kalliopi Antoniou

Kalliopi Antoniou — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:03:51 +0000

2012 is by far the best disaster movie I’ve ever seen. I’ve never seen better CGI efects in a disaster movie. It was magnificent! The plot is good, but its just strange how they always get away from the exclusion of disasters Gordon, Sasha and Tamara. What I do not understand is why people think that the CGI effects are horrible, and why they think this movie sucks. Who ever reads what people listen to listen to people negitive positive. This movie is all Pennie and believe me when the film ends you shocked and you get a whole new meaning in life. BUY IT! Rating: 5 / 5

By: John Kubenski Jr.

John Kubenski Jr. — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:02:37 +0000

I just want to mention that I saw this movie and it was the best movie I’ve ever seen. It showed the possibility this may happen in 2012 Rating: 5 / 5

By: Ashtar Command

Ashtar Command — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:12:11 +0000

I have not watched this movie. Just as I watch. I looked at the remorque.Tout happens rather familiar. . . I suspect “2012″ is just another disaster movie, but with more special effects spectaculaires.Bâillement.Peut be a Rebout starring Bruce Willis could do the trick? They could call it “Die Hard REALLY 2012.” Furthermore, all claims of the end of the world arrives in 2012 are false. Nothing will happen in 2012, I assure you. Except that Barack Obama will be re-elected! May that be the bitter end of the neo-conservatives and the Leo-Cons, but hardly of the world as telle.Et if we’re really lucky, maybe Ronald Emmerich will make a new disaster movie? I am sure that the apocalyptic sects set a new date in 2012 when the disaster fails to materialize. Some illusions, after all, life dure.Rating: 2 / 5